May 6, 2003
Sen. Harkin
Calls on Bush AdministrationTo Revamp Country-of-Origin Labeling Plan
Sen.
Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) has called on the Bush administration to reconsider
country-of-origin labelling plans he claims would place an unnecessary
burden on U.S. agriculture producers, reports Bureau of National Affairs
(BNA).
Harkin,
ranking Democrat on the Senate Agriculture Committee, said that regulations
now being developed by the U.S. Agriculture Department will be "unnecessarily
complicated and burdensome"--establishing a "painstaking and impractical"
recordkeeping system that is not warranted by law or common sense.
"A
workable and feasible system is achievable and critical to the success
of this program," he said. "There is developing an appearance [that]
... USDA does not have an interest in creating a workable program."
Harkin
said in a May 1 letter to U.S. Agriculture Secretary Ann M. Veneman
that there has been an "uproar" from nearly every sector of the U.S.
agriculture industry over the plan.
Last
month, the National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) asked Congress to
reopen legislation enacted last year--the Farm Security and Rural Investment
Act of 2002--that requires USDA to put in place mandatory country-of-origin
labeling regulations by Sept. 30, 2004, saying that the program will
cost agriculture producers up to $2 billion a year.
According
to BNA, a spokeswoman for the House Agriculture Committee said that
a hearing on the issue would be scheduled for some time after Memorial
Day.
Also
last month, the Grocery Manufacturers of America said in comments filed
with the Agriculture Department that the country-of-origin labeling
program potentially could force U.S. food manufacturers to source their
produce or ingredients overseas.
U.S.
farm groups including the American Farm Bureau Federation and the National
Farmers Union have supported the plan--initially opposed by the Bush
administration--on the grounds that it would distinguish American-made
agricultural products from their foreign competitors, providing U.S.
producers with a marketing edge.
Harkin,
however, said in his letter to Veneman May 1 that Congress never envisioned
that USDA would "distort" the program by requiring, for example, third-party
verification of country-of-origin certification.
"I
am perplexed why USDA continues down this ill-conceived path when more
straightforward means to implement the program exist," Harkin said.
"What is most disturbing is that the department thus far has refused
to consider seriously other more workable approaches, such as producer
self-certification and relying up the existing country of origin information
for covered commodities already required by customs upon entry into
the U.S."